Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: "Greg Smith" <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "KaiGai Kohei" <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Takahiro Itagaki" <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Subject: Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
Date: 2010-01-23 16:32:37
Message-ID: 9581.1264264357@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> ...  After a few minutes that left me curious just how big
> the database was, so I tried:
 
> select pg_size_pretty(pg_database_size('test'));
 
> I did a Ctrl+C after about five minutes and got:
 
> Cancel request sent
 
> but it didn't return for 15 or 20 minutes.

Hm, we probably are lacking CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in the inner loops in
dbsize.c ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-01-23 16:36:01
Subject: Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-01-23 16:23:51
Subject: Re: commit fests

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group