Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: libpq API incompatibility between 7.4 and 8.0

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Martin Pitt <mpitt(at)debian(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org,Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: libpq API incompatibility between 7.4 and 8.0
Date: 2005-02-02 23:53:08
Message-ID: 9562.1107388388@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> ... If they don't have 
> different sonames, then we declare that they are compatible, so it 
> should be OK to have only the latest version installed.  That requires 
> us to stay honest with the sonames, but it does not require us to 
> increase the sonames unnecessarily.

Well, the problem I'm concerned about is how do we stay honest.  We now
realize that our devel procedures may not catch this sort of mistake.

It might be that the Windows DLLs will catch any unintentional
dependencies, but I'm not feeling especially comfortable about it.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: John HansenDate: 2005-02-03 00:35:29
Subject: unicode upper/lower functions
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2005-02-02 23:49:59
Subject: Re: pg_dump bug in 7.3.9 with sequences

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2005-02-03 00:00:08
Subject: Re: Refactoring lock.c
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-02-02 23:46:11
Subject: Re: libpq API incompatibility between 7.4 and 8.0

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group