From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Mephysto <mephystoonhell(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Show stored function code |
Date: | 2012-03-29 02:18:20 |
Message-ID: | 9512.1332987500@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Mephysto <mephystoonhell(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> \df+ shows function code.
> well, I'm suspecting operator error, because psql \df+ func queries
> pg_proc. if you don't believe me, fire up psql with the -E switch and
> it will echo all sql it sends to the server and you'll see it queries
> pg_proc. take the query it runs, and gradually cut it down and you
> should find the reason. perhaps line formatting is throwing you off
> maybe.
I'm wondering if the OP has accidentally created another table called
"pg_proc". Usually the system version would come first in the search
path, but maybe he's using a non-default search path? If this is the
right guess, then the reason \df works is that it qualifies pg_proc
as pg_catalog.pg_proc.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mephysto | 2012-03-29 07:10:26 | Re: Show stored function code |
Previous Message | Alan Hodgson | 2012-03-29 00:29:59 | Re: Trouble upgrading from v9.0 to 9.1 |