| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump pretty_print |
| Date: | 2007-01-20 05:02:15 |
| Message-ID: | 9501.1169269335@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> writes:
> Atached is a patch to allow pretty printing of system objects
> (constraints, indexes, rules, and views) when doing a pg_dump via a
> --pretty-print flag along with a warning in the docs to be careful about
> doing so :)
Why exactly is that a good idea? Seems like a foot-gun with marginal
usefulness. If you want to look at things "pretty", the psql \d
commands are the tool to use.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-20 05:03:01 | Re: BUG #2907: pg_get_serial_sequence quoting |
| Previous Message | Gavin Sherry | 2007-01-20 04:58:00 | Re: Planning aggregates which require sorted or distinct |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-20 05:03:01 | Re: BUG #2907: pg_get_serial_sequence quoting |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-01-20 04:32:30 | Re: [GENERAL] Corrupt database? |