Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?
Date: 2010-02-26 00:03:34
Message-ID: 9477.1267142614@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-performance
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Did this get addressed?

Partially.  There are stats now but autovacuum is not bright about
when to update them.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Tory M BlueDate: 2010-02-26 06:12:25
Subject: bgwriter, checkpoints, curious (seeing delays)
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-02-25 23:46:33
Subject: Re: No hash join across partitioned tables?

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Karl SchnaitterDate: 2010-02-26 00:11:54
Subject: Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-02-25 23:59:50
Subject: Re: strict version of version_stamp.pl

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group