Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ryan Kirkpatrick <pgsql(at)rkirkpat(dot)net>
Cc: Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
Date: 2000-12-29 02:47:25
Message-ID: 9403.978058045@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Ryan Kirkpatrick <pgsql(at)rkirkpat(dot)net> writes:
> 	Good news is that it solves the 'misc' regression test failure. It
> now passes with flying colors! The bad news is that the 'oid' regression
> test is still broken (with the exact same problem as before). I think
> Brent hit the same problem... I guess, verify that your oid fix actually
> hit the CVS tree, and if it did, rethink the solution. :(

I believe that is fixed as of src/backend/utils/adt/oid.c v 1.43,
committed at Thu Dec 28 01:51:15 2000 UTC.  It should have been in
Thursday morning's snapshot.  If you've got 1.43 and it still fails
the regress test, let me know.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-12-29 04:08:05
Subject: Re: Alpha tas() patch
Previous:From: Brent VernerDate: 2000-12-29 02:45:56
Subject: Re: Alpha tas() patch

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-12-29 04:08:05
Subject: Re: Alpha tas() patch
Previous:From: Brent VernerDate: 2000-12-29 02:45:56
Subject: Re: Alpha tas() patch

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group