Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Mentioning Slony in docs

From: Decibel! <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Mentioning Slony in docs
Date: 2007-11-15 17:11:32
Message-ID: 93A76FF2-1ECD-4E1F-8E16-7125D4032272@decibel.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacypgsql-docs
On Nov 8, 2007, at 9:28 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> My understanding was that we were trying to show equal favour to  
>>> all of
>>> the various solutions. This was a reason not to do that.
>>
>> The reason for taking a "balanced approach" is that no one solution
>> fits everyone's needs.  I don't think the core docs should be pushing
>> Slony more than other solutions.
>
> We do mention Slony for in-place upgrades because if its  
> capabilities to
> work across Postgres versions.

I'm pretty sure Skytools/Londiste works across versions too.  
Presumably, any replication that's not based on binary format should  
work.
-- 
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect  decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828


In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-11-15 20:00:08
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Avoiding upgrade backlash
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-11-14 19:49:26
Subject: Re: Normalized Ranking example incorrect in text search

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2007-11-15 20:00:08
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Avoiding upgrade backlash
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2007-11-15 14:43:28
Subject: Re: Argentina and advocacy (re: regional contacts)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group