On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> 2010/2/17 Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>:
>> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Guillaume Lelarge
>> <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>>> The server status patch for previous release had quite some changes, so
>>> I'm not sure that four timers are still essential. Anyways, we can still
>>> have four different timers and only one refresh rate.
>>> Dave, do you remember why you think four timers are essential?
>> Because refreshing some panes is much more expensive than others. If
>> you can come up with a better UI design, feel free, but I don't want
>> to lose the ability to have different refresh rates for each pane.
> Do we actually need different ones for each pane though, or do we just
> need one for the log and one for the rest? (That might open up more
> options for how to make such an UI..)
Thats a possibility.
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
In response to
pgadmin-hackers by date
|Next:||From: pgAdmin Trac||Date: 2010-02-18 20:58:15|
|Subject: [pgAdmin III] #141: Provide a way to reload conf|
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2010-02-18 11:27:29|
|Subject: Re: Refresh timer in status window very unintuitive|