Re: buildfarm breakage

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, zb <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Subject: Re: buildfarm breakage
Date: 2010-02-09 08:54:15
Message-ID: 937d27e11002090054s63eab08bvbf122e5394b50937@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> wrote:
> Actually I was hoping someone with some Windows experience would take a look at
> it or Zoltan would come up with a fix, after all it was his addition. :-)
>
> Looking at the portability header file it appears that isnan/isinf are only one
> line defines, so it doesn't look like a major problem adding these. I will try
> fixing this, but bear with me as I have to use the buildfarm for testing. I
> don't have a Windows build environment.

If you feel inclined, you can always use Amazon EC2 for Win32 testing:

http://blog.hagander.net/archives/151-Testing-PostgreSQL-patches-on-Windows-using-Amazon-EC2.html

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2010-02-09 09:00:51 Re: buildfarm breakage
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2010-02-09 08:39:50 Re: buildfarm breakage