Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Application name patch - v4

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v4
Date: 2009-12-01 16:33:54
Message-ID: 937d27e10912010833o7cc6f0acs39ed2f07ac6b6419@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> If people are agreed that double connect is a better alternative

I still kinda like 'SET DEFAULT', but I'm far from wed to it. A double
connect certainly seems like it would be better than the
inconsistency.

> I'm willing to go look at how to make it happen.

That's good, 'cos I'm sure it'll end up being a whole lot less ugly
than if I did it :-)

-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Greg Sabino MullaneDate: 2009-12-01 16:39:51
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Rewrite GEQO`s gimme_tree function so that it always finds a
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-12-01 16:28:22
Subject: Re: Application name patch - v4

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group