Re: Suggestion for pgAgent

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Suggestion for pgAgent
Date: 2009-11-17 04:38:10
Message-ID: 937d27e10911162038k3c0dc223u9ede968e7d18923c@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:07 AM, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at> wrote:
> Dear hackers,
>
> I asked this question on pgadmin-general before, and
> there was no reply. Maybe this list is more appropriate.
>
> When you configure an SQL job step, you can configure a database
> on which the script should run, but you cannot specify a database user.
>
> I'd like to define schedules for various database users, and
> while it would be possible to work around the limitation by
> writing some wrapper functions in the database, the best thing
> from my perspective would be to enhance pgAgent (and pgAdmin III)
> to support a database user that pgAgent uses to connect to
> execute a certain job step.
>
> Is that an option? I think it would be a valuable addition,
> and it would alleviate one of the "security concerns" stated
> in the documentation.

Sure, it's definitely an option - provided it can be done in a secure
way. Want to work on it?

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Albe Laurenz 2009-11-17 07:50:06 Re: Suggestion for pgAgent
Previous Message pgAdmin Trac 2009-11-16 18:13:51 Re: [pgAdmin III] #91: Text Search Configuration Mapping displayed out of order, pgAdmin 1.10.0