From:
Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To:
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc:
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:
Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows
Date:
2009-08-10 15:17:32
Message-ID:
937d27e10908100817t49f7358aoecb2c6b4312aaacf@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2009-07-14 10:22:42 from Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
2009-07-14 13:46:51 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2009-07-14 14:02:37 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2009-07-14 15:23:42 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2009-07-14 15:28:47 from Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
2009-07-14 17:19:38 from Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
2009-07-14 18:18:30 from Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
2009-07-14 18:17:47 from Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
2009-07-14 16:31:13 from Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
2009-07-14 15:26:47 from Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
2009-07-15 09:20:30 from Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
2009-07-21 12:06:25 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
2009-07-22 15:05:40 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
2009-07-23 06:04:52 from Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
2009-07-23 07:04:09 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
2009-07-24 20:13:17 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
2009-08-10 11:41:59 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
2009-08-10 14:10:53 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2009-08-10 14:33:17 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
2009-08-10 14:45:14 from Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
2009-08-10 14:49:48 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
2009-08-10 14:56:45 from Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
2009-08-10 14:58:01 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2009-08-10 15:17:32 from Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
2009-08-10 15:29:58 from Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
2009-08-10 15:35:54 from Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
2009-08-10 17:33:18 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
2009-08-11 14:30:26 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
2009-08-11 15:14:08 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
2009-08-11 11:52:13 from Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Lists:
pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:58 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 16:10, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> 8.2 as well, no?
>
>> 8.2 has a different shmem implementation - the one that emulates sysv
>> shmem. The patch will need to be changed around for that, and I
>> haven't looked at that. It may be worthwhile to do that, but it's a -
>> separate patch, so let's get it out in 8.3 and 8.4 first.
>
> If it's at all hard to do, I could see deprecating 8.2 for Windows
> instead.
I could most definitely agree with that on a personal level - no more
Mingw/msys builds to maintain :-)
Alas, it's probably not practical to drop it without inconveniencing a
great many Windows users.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2009-08-10 15:19:37Subject : Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schemaPrevious :From : Tom LaneDate : 2009-08-10 15:00:42Subject : Re: WIP: to_char, support for EEEE format
