Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows
Date: 2009-08-10 14:45:14
Message-ID: 937d27e10908100745r1c1aa777y684311cc97495223@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Magnus Hagander<magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 16:10, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>>> It's been a couple of weeks now, and I've had a number of reports both
>>> on-list, on-blog and in private, from people using this. I have not
>>> yet had a single report of a problem caused by this patch (not
>>> counting the case where there was a version mismatch - can't fault the
>>> patch for that).
>>
>>> Given that, I say we apply this for 8.3 and 8.4 now. Comments?
>>
>> 8.2 as well, no?
>
> 8.2 has a different shmem implementation - the one that emulates sysv
> shmem. The patch will need to be changed around for that, and I
> haven't looked at that. It may be worthwhile to do that, but it's a
> separate patch, so let's get it out in 8.3 and 8.4 first.

Has anyone reported the problem on 8.2?

-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK:   http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2009-08-10 14:49:48
Subject: Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2009-08-10 14:33:17
Subject: Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group