Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tsutomu Yamada <tsutomu(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: Proposal: More portable way to support 64bit platforms
Date: 2009-07-24 21:41:18
Message-ID: 937d27e10907241441w67a242bag77ce694d10c26485@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:35 PM, Stephen Frost<sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> Peter,
>
> * Peter Eisentraut (peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net) wrote:
>> After closer inspection, not having a win64 box available, I have my doubts
>> whether this patch actually does anything.  Foremost, it doesn't touch the
>> definition of the Datum type, which ought to be at the core of a change like
>> this.
>
> Do you need access to a Win64 box?  I can provide you access to a
> Win64 system, which Dave Page and Magnus already have access to, if it
> would be useful..

I haven't got round to installing a build env on there yet btw.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Reini Urban 2009-07-24 21:47:03 Enable SSPI on cygwin
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2009-07-24 21:35:50 Re: explain refactoring v4