On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Guillaume
> Le lundi 20 juillet 2009 à 19:06:50, Dave Page a écrit :
>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Guillaume
>> Lelarge<guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
>> > The latter. I don't see a way to catch them all easily. I'll commit this,
>> > and try to find a way to catch the others.
>> Good luck with that. We use multi-sentence statements in practically
>> every SQL dialogue to group together commands like "CREATE xxx; ALTER
>> xxx; COMMENT ON xxx;" to run everything as one transaction without
>> explicitly starting or ending one. Changing that would require some
>> fairly invasive changes.
> Hmmmm. You're right. I don't know why I didn't think about this. Should I
> revert my patch? it doesn't do any good (and no bad AFAICT).
The downside is an extra roundtrip. If it doesn't help, let's back it out.
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
In response to
pgadmin-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Guillaume Lelarge||Date: 2009-07-21 08:20:30|
|Subject: Re: Re: [pgadmin-support] pgAdmin3 Version 1.10.0 : Crash when configuring an pgAgent job|
|Previous:||From: Guillaume Lelarge||Date: 2009-07-20 21:32:46|
|Subject: Re: [Pgpool-general] backend mismatch|