On Tuesday, July 14, 2009, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> > Tsutomu Yamada wrote:
>> >> This patch using VirtualAlloc()/VirtualFree() to avoid failing in
>> >> reattach to shared memory.
>> > Since this fixes a very annoying bug present in older versions, I think
>> > this should be backpatched all the way back to 8.2.
>> Agreed, but first we need some evidence that it actually fixes the
>> problem. How can we acquire such evidence?
> Send the patch to the people who has reported trouble and see if it
> seems gone? If somebody is able to build patched Win32 packages I could
> point a couple of guys in the spanish list to them.
I built a version which a guy is currently testing. He could reproduce
the bug easily, but last i heard, the patch was looking good.
Don't have the details here tho.
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2009-07-14 18:18:30|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] "could not reattach to shared memory" on Windows|
|Previous:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2009-07-14 18:17:14|
|Subject: Re: Alpha release process|