On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Bruce Momjian<bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Jaime Casanova wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Dave Page<dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>> > Fwiw, i think having an sf.net project is a *bad* idea anyway. It's
>> > confusing for people who find that project and don't realise it's not
>> > actually used for anything. It seems a strange thing to maintain
>> > anyway - it's not exactly likely to attract new users.
>> yeah! i was wondering about the very same thing... what's the
>> usefulness for maintaining a sf.net project?
> I don't know, but as long as it exists we should keep it current. Do we
> want to remove it?
I think we should.
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2009-07-06 13:52:14|
|Subject: Re: commitfest.postgresql.org|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2009-07-06 13:09:07|
|Subject: Re: Sourceforge PG release|