On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Marc G. Fournier<scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Dave Page wrote:
>> Yes - that was what I thought everyone agreed. Otherwise, I just end
>> up having to approve potentially dozens of messages if a thread
>> crosses over from somewhere else.
> configset pgsql-www restrict_post <<ENDAAB
I just realised you only did that for -www. The idea was to do it for
all the lists. For example, I just had to deal with this:
> The following request:
> "(post to webmaster)"
> was sent to postgresql.org
> by Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>.
> The request requires your confirmation for the following reason(s):
> The author (Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>)
> is not a member of any of the restrict_post groups.
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-06-16 14:42:47|
|Subject: Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-16 |
|Previous:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2009-06-16 14:39:07|
|Subject: Re: PostgreSQL moderation report: 2009-6-16|