Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch for pgScript

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Mickael Deloison <mdeloison(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch for pgScript
Date: 2009-01-21 13:38:04
Message-ID: 937d27e10901210538i5151397ayffc25eccdfb7a7c7@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Sorry for the delay in reviewing.
>
> Does using "[PGSWARNG]" really make sense? It saves only *two*
> characters over the much more readanle "[PGSWARNING]"

Urgh. Definitely less readable.


-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK:   http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2009-01-21 13:44:38
Subject: Re: Patch for pgScript
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2009-01-21 12:39:38
Subject: Re: Patch for pgScript

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group