From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Chander Ganesan" <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, damien(at)dalibo(dot)info |
Subject: | Re: 9.0 ? |
Date: | 2009-01-06 19:45:31 |
Message-ID: | 937d27e10901061145u968c105x61744d7c844f4f78@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>
> With some bemusement I notice your posts on this topic whenever "PostgreSQL
> 10" is mentioned anywhere. But it is quite frankly complete nonsense. Any
> packaging system worth anything can handle that without any problem.
Even Windows will cope with it :-p
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2009-01-07 06:00:53 | Re: 9.0 ? |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2009-01-06 19:30:53 | Re: 9.0 ? |