| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation |
| Date: | 2008-11-24 14:21:52 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e10811240621r1644db00s8905fd8c2ba86906@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 1:53 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>>> No, there is no need to clutter every installation in the world with such a
>>> database. You could make it an addon module, or a pgfoundry project.
>
>> That would defeat the point.
>
> By that logic, we should install the sample stuff in template1, to
> ensure that the examples would "just work" wherever $newbie tries
> to execute them :-(
*sigh*. Or one of us could visit their office and show them what to
do, but I think we know the difference between making something usable
out of the box and going overboard.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | A. Kretschmer | 2008-11-24 14:29:33 | Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation |
| Previous Message | Sam Mason | 2008-11-24 14:19:03 | Re: literal limits in 8.3 |