Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [Fwd: Re: [GENERAL] temp schemas]

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [GENERAL] temp schemas]
Date: 2008-08-29 07:08:32
Message-ID: 937d27e10808290008x2142eba6r1446bccb475e692c@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Actually, might it be an idea to stick the temp tables in their own
> "subnode", that won't be loaded unless someone actually intentionally
> looks at it?

I don't think it's worth the pain to be honest. Temp tables will only
show up under temp schemas anyway, and they are hidden by default.

-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK:   http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2008-08-29 08:14:54
Subject: Re: Two usability suggestions
Previous:From: Robins TharakanDate: 2008-08-29 00:40:23
Subject: Two usability suggestions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group