On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Actually, might it be an idea to stick the temp tables in their own
> "subnode", that won't be loaded unless someone actually intentionally
> looks at it?
I don't think it's worth the pain to be honest. Temp tables will only
show up under temp schemas anyway, and they are hidden by default.
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
In response to
pgadmin-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2008-08-29 08:14:54|
|Subject: Re: Two usability suggestions|
|Previous:||From: Robins Tharakan||Date: 2008-08-29 00:40:23|
|Subject: Two usability suggestions|