On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> Does that sound about right?
> We dumped the static library part, because that library would depend on
> pgadmin itself, and we'd either get duplicate symbols or a circular
> (pgScript requires a few classes from pgAdmin to work)
> So we're back to linking directly with pgadmin.
Oh, OK - well I'm fine with that.
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
In response to
pgadmin-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Luis Ochoa||Date: 2008-08-14 20:31:06|
|Subject: Re: New Patch for GQB|
|Previous:||From: Mickael Deloison||Date: 2008-08-14 15:35:23|
|Subject: Re: pgScript patch based on pgScript-1.0-beta-3|