Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: License question

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Mickael Deloison" <mdeloison(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: License question
Date: 2008-04-25 08:59:29
Message-ID: 937d27e10804250159w7755d8cfvb8a2896862331c94@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Mickael Deloison <mdeloison(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The Artistic License only seems fine and simple, so I am going to go for it.
> About psql integration, I have never thought about it. But pgScript is
> written in C++ (with objects and RTTI) and I think if its features
> were integrated into psql, it would be done in a different way, so
> this is not an issue right now.

OK, cool - Artistic only is most certainly the cleanest and most
agreeable approach imho.


-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK:   http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

pgadmin-hackers by date

Next:From: Zdenek KotalaDate: 2008-04-25 09:49:22
Subject: Re: Broken 1.8.2 source tar ball?
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2008-04-25 08:58:06
Subject: Re: Broken 1.8.2 source tar ball?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group