Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based
Date: 2008-03-22 14:14:36
Message-ID: 937d27e10803220714q29906c2cg3ab43c9a2735f622@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:

>  Everyone here seems to be in agreement.  So what are the next steps?
>  Setup a parallel email infrastructure, test it, and switch over?  What
>  else needs to be moved?

It's not exactly that easy because there is a complex mix of email
accounts, majordomo lists, anti-spam and anti-virus, and integration
with the archives system to take into account.

Once we have agreement from the appropriate person (who will have to
agree, given that he owns the domain), the sysadmins team can start to
figure out what's needed and provision the appropriate VM.

Note that any new mail infrastructure *will* be managed by the
sysadmin team as part of the existing FreeBSD infrastructure. Doing it
any other way invalidates most of the arguments for moving it in the
first place.


-- 
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK Ltd: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk

In response to

Responses

pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-03-22 14:21:42
Subject: Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-03-22 14:07:41
Subject: Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group