On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 10:22 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > > I saw your request for documentation on the infrastructure but I don't
> > > remember anything else. I don't se this as a core discussion because
> > > the team is going to be more than core folks.
> > I've suggested a number of times that we need to decouple all
> > postgresql.org mail infrastructure from hub.org so it can be
> > independently managed. Numerous people have been asked the same thing
> > here for much longer, but have given up because the answer has always
> > been no. Thats why I've been raising it in core.
> OK, so maybe there is the crux. Who says "no" unchallenged? I don't
> think I can, and I don't think anyone else in this community can either.
I think you can guess who says no (if not, I'll tell you out of band).
I seem to be the only person doing any challenging and without some
nods of agreement at least I cannot do much more. We do at least have
some more documentation as of yesterday though... but the current
problems are with a whole server which that doesn't help with.
EnterpriseDB UK Ltd: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL UK 2008 Conference: http://www.postgresql.org.uk
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Marc G. Fournier||Date: 2008-03-20 23:44:39|
|Subject: Re: pgsql-committers list is misconfigured|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2008-03-20 22:22:54|
|Subject: Re: Time to get infrastructure team-based|