On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 01:49 +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> > So I was thinking some more about the lack of real use that techdocs
> > is getting coupled with the lack of any kind of spam etc. that we've
> > picked up on it. I think we should reconsider having an official
> > PostgreSQL wiki for users, probably at wiki.postgresql.org.
> > Thoughts?
> I guess I'll have to concede. It's quite clear that the techdocs we have
> now doesn't work the way we intended. I'm not entirely convinced that a
> wiki will work much better, but since others are, let's give it a shot.
Hey, that was easier than I expected.
> AFAIK, Stefan has some experience with the options there - what wiki
> software should we be using? Do we still have one VM empty on the boxes
> in France we could use?
I just spoke to Stefan - we do have a spare clean VM pretty much ready
to go, originally provisioned some time ago to become a new developer
VM for the webteam, but I never got round to moving everything from
developer.pgadmin.org. We can put that to use.
The other thing we need to consider is tying this into the existing
community logon system. I believe mediawiki now supports OpenID, so we
should just see about hooking a provider into the existing database.
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Oracle-compatible database company
In response to
pgsql-www by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2008-02-24 10:01:08|
|Subject: Re: User Wiki|
|Previous:||From: Dave Page||Date: 2008-02-24 09:42:45|
|Subject: Re: archives.postgresql.org change|