Re: bug in pgadmin 1.8.2: missing entry in 'Data Type' list

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: "Guillaume Lelarge" <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
Cc: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Peter Gagarinov" <heartofmars(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: bug in pgadmin 1.8.2: missing entry in 'Data Type' list
Date: 2008-02-13 14:58:58
Message-ID: 937d27e10802130658w41763bcdud128f3636ab0cce1@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-support

On Feb 13, 2008 2:56 PM, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> That's something I already heard at Solutions Linux 2008. I talked with
> someone who has this kind of issues. This guy has lots of tables, so his
> type combo box is really huge, and becomes actually unusable.
>
> Table types are perfectly valid and we need to have them, but the combo
> box becomes (is already?) unusable. We probably should think about
> designing if differently : for example a text box and a button. The text
> box allows someone to quickly, but manually, put a type, and the button
> allows to open a new window with a listbox containing all types and two
> checkboxes, one to add/remove array types, another one to add/remove
> table types.

OK, so I'm thinking for now then we should just remove table types
altogether - as Peter reports, we only show the array types anyway, so
I guess few people actually want to use them given that we've had no
prior complaints.

We can add a TODO to redesign things later.

--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Oracle-compatible database company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-support by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2008-02-13 15:05:45 Re: bug in pgadmin 1.8.2: missing entry in 'Data Type' list
Previous Message Guillaume Lelarge 2008-02-13 14:56:35 Re: bug in pgadmin 1.8.2: missing entry in 'Data Type' list