| From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Cc: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Overblogging etc |
| Date: | 2008-01-14 20:59:15 |
| Message-ID: | 937d27e10801141259x63d5f672n1acfb63b59e55c00@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 14/01/2008, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Devrim,
>
> > No, I'm strongly against this idea -- Noone is blogging about sex,
> > religion, politics, etc. Every blog is more or less PostgreSQL related
> > -- as I wrote before: It is all about freedom : I don't want to check
> > the validity of the blog content. Every blogger is mature enough and
> > they know what to blog.
>
> It's not a question about appropriate (although that has happened once),
> it's a question about lightweight blog entries. For example, I'm about to
> blog that I moved my photo collection from Flickr to Smugmug. That
> probably shouldn't be on the PostgreSQL homepage.
What, including your food porn? Don't they have rules about that sort
of thing on Smugmug?
:-p
/D
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-01-14 21:02:05 | Re: Overblogging etc |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2008-01-14 20:56:48 | Re: Overblogging etc |