Re: Release Candidate of the PostgreSQL Europe association statutes

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, damien(at)dalibo(dot)info, pgeu-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Release Candidate of the PostgreSQL Europe association statutes
Date: 2008-01-13 22:09:04
Message-ID: 937d27e10801131409q2fa35e6cpa2507e4a1ef4604@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgeu-general

On 13/01/2008, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Exactly. I guess PG-EU should allow standard membership for those
> countries that do not have a national group (a non profit organisation).
> For those that have one (at the moment France and Italy, soon UK),
> membership will be automatically redirected to the national group. The
> national group will pay an annual fee (or part of the member quote) to
> the EU PUG.

Yes!! That's almost exactly what I just wrote to Andreas :-)

If others are in agreement, can the rules be reworked to allow for this?

/D

In response to

Responses

Browse pgeu-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2008-01-13 22:09:06 Re: Release Candidate of the PostgreSQL Europe association statutes
Previous Message Dave Page 2008-01-13 22:06:01 Re: Release Candidate of the PostgreSQL Europe association statutes