Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Performance Improvement for Unique Indexes

From: Gokulakannan Somasundaram <gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jochem van Dieten <jochemd(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance Improvement for Unique Indexes
Date: 2010-03-24 12:18:11
Message-ID: 9362e74e1003240518g3a681545ifaf8644c86f0197c@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
>
>
> How are you going to unmark the hint bit in case of a rollback?
>
>
Only after you find that the transaction is committed, this hint bit has to
be set. It is equivalent to any other hint bit.

Gokul.

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2010-03-24 12:31:06
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make standby server continuously retry restoring the next WAL
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2010-03-24 11:52:10
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add connection messages for streaming replication.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group