Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables

From: Gokulakannan Somasundaram <gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Karl Schnaitter <karlsch(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: A thought on Index Organized Tables
Date: 2010-03-02 09:04:10
Message-ID: 9362e74e1003020104q14a4b3fayb7c4ae5ca8bdc510@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
>
>
> I think you have to take up a simpler project as a first project. This
> is a major overhaul of transaction information and it depends on
> understanding how a lot of different areas work -- all of which are
> very complex tricky areas to understand.
>
>
>
Greg,
          I just feel the fast full index scan may not be of much value, if
we have to go to the table for visibility information. I think the feature
needs the visibility map to get completed. Please let me know, if you feel
otherwise.

Thanks,
Gokul.

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2010-03-02 09:48:28
Subject: Re: pg_stop_backup does not complete
Previous:From: Albe LaurenzDate: 2010-03-02 08:18:48
Subject: WAL replay does not verify integrity

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group