Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps

From: "Gokulakannan Somasundaram" <gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Markus Schiltknecht" <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>, "Andrew Sullivan" <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
Subject: Re: Dynamic Partitioning using Segment Visibility Maps
Date: 2008-01-05 19:42:32
Message-ID: 9362e74e0801051142p50210q4f4073e38b57f98f@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Jan 5, 2008 6:15 PM, <tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de> wrote:

>
> One thought I had back then, with partitioned tables was "gee -- B-tree
> index is already doing a partition; why do a manual partition on top of
> that?".
>
> Can you please explain more on what you are trying to say here?


Thanks,
Gokul.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2008-01-05 21:05:20
Subject: Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets
Previous:From: Mark MielkeDate: 2008-01-05 19:14:53
Subject: Re: SSL over Unix-domain sockets

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group