On Jan 3, 2008 12:44 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Gokulakannan Somasundaram" <gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I actually mean to say that DDLs can be declared as self-committing.
> Egad, an Oracle lover in our midst.
:). True, its an impact of working more with Oracle. I made the suggestion
here, because it might reduce some if conditions.
> Most of us think that roll-back-able DDL is one of the best features of
> Postgres, and certainly one of our best selling points vis-a-vis Oracle.
> Don't expect us to give it up.
Can you please explain, any specific use-case where DDLs are necessary
within a transaction?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: David Fetter||Date: 2008-01-03 08:11:00|
|Subject: Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-01-03 07:14:49|
|Subject: Re: Table rewrites vs. pending AFTER triggers |