Re: shared memory problem

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Teter <michael_teter(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: rocael(at)usa(dot)net, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: shared memory problem
Date: 2000-11-13 15:32:37
Message-ID: 9348.974129557@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Michael Teter <michael_teter(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> Perhaps there's some issue with the shared memory not
> being freed quickly enough by the kernel?

Never heard of that before. There is an issue with time delays
on release of port addresses --- sometimes you may get a failure
to bind() to a port address that was just released by a previous
incarnation of the postmaster. But I haven't heard of such a
thing for shared memory or semaphores.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Wampler 2000-11-13 17:13:06 Using a postgres table to maintain unique id?
Previous Message Michael Teter 2000-11-13 12:17:43 Re: shared memory problem