Re: Information/schema hiding...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org>
Cc: Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Information/schema hiding...
Date: 2004-04-12 13:34:23
Message-ID: 9311.1081776863@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

I said:
> Sean Chittenden <sean(at)chittenden(dot)org> writes:
>> To prevent this, I changed the
>> behavior of SET search_path so that it validates its input.

> ... It would be possible to make interactive SET behave differently
> from the non-interactive case,

Wait a minute --- scratch what I said above; interactive "SET
search_path" already does behave differently from noninteractive.
So what did your patch change exactly?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephan Szabo 2004-04-12 14:16:28 Re: make == as = ?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-04-12 13:29:52 Re: user-defined default public acl

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-04-12 13:41:40 Re: COPY for CSV documentation
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-04-12 12:38:19 Re: COPY for CSV documentation