> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> Patch applied. Thanks.
> Has this been reviewed at all? I thought we were still discussing what
> the behavior should be, let alone whether the patch is correct.
Actually, now that I look at it, this patch is definitely *not* correct,
as it does not implement any of the behaviors suggested as reasonable;
and the discussion is still ongoing in any case.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2006-04-30 00:16:16|
|Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-04-29 19:34:28|
|Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64 |