Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for matching wildcard server certificates to the new

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for matching wildcard server certificates to the new
Date: 2008-12-01 17:18:41
Message-ID: 92EED756-A454-4AD6-B7D0-80FE358388AC@hagander.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
On 1 dec 2008, at 18.10, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> I could assign it to a variable, but won't the compiler just optimize
>> that away?
>
> Wouldn't count on that, particularly not if you are modifying other
> strings at the same time.
>
I'm not modifying them. But - point taken, will change.

Another q: given that we no longer need fnmatch(), should we remove it  
from port, or leave it around in case we need it in the future? (it's  
not like we can't get it back if we need it, but...)

/Magnus


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-12-01 17:22:45
Subject: Re: New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-12-01 17:10:15
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for matching wildcard server certificates to the new

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-12-01 17:28:32
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add support for matching wildcard server certificates to the new
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2008-12-01 17:11:18
Subject: pgsql: Modify the new to_timestamp implementation so that

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group