On Dec 29, 2006, at 12:30 PM, Chris Browne wrote:
> How you get the work to spread consistently across 6 hours is a
> challenge; personally, my preference would generally be to try to get
> the work done ASAP, so the goal seems a tad off to me...
Agreed. If we're going to monkey with automatically setting vacuum
cost GUCs I'd *much* rather work towards having some kind of I/O
priority scheme; that would allow vacuum to use as much I/O as it
wants, provided nothing else in the system needs it.
Jim Nasby jim(at)nasby(dot)net
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell)
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jim Nasby||Date: 2007-01-03 15:33:35|
|Subject: Re: effective_cache_size vs units|
|Previous:||From: Stephen Frost||Date: 2007-01-03 15:17:16|
|Subject: Re: TODO: GNU TLS|