"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 9:34 AM, in message
> <1A6E6D554222284AB25ABE3229A92762715521(at)nrtexcus702(dot)int(dot)asurion(dot)com>, "Roberts,
> Jon" <Jon(dot)Roberts(at)asurion(dot)com> wrote:
>> These two fields should be consistent because they should be formatted
>> the same way.
> Why would you think that?
Indeed the whole *point* of to_char() is to display the value in a
different format than the type's standard output converter would use.
I think it'd be a reasonable complaint that to_char() offers no way
to control how many fractional-second digits you get in its output;
but that's a missing feature not a bug.
> I can think of a couple database products which only go to three
> decimal positions, and always show three, but that's hardly a
Considering that to_char() is intended to be compatible with *r*cl*e,
if that's what they do then we may be stuck with doing the same.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2008-01-31 16:55:48|
|Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Better default_statistics_target|
|Previous:||From: Andrew Dunstan||Date: 2008-01-31 16:28:19|
|Subject: Re: Oops - BF:Mastodon just died|