Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 18:31, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Hmm. I think that not resetting the n_tuples_xxx fields was simply an
>> oversight in Magnus' patch that added them,
>> Magnus, was this intentional by any chance?
> Nope, not that I can recall. Looks like an oversight.
OK, applied, along with the last_autovac_time reset --- I concluded that
keeping that at the database level wouldn't be consistent, since we're
throwing it away at the table level.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-12-13 01:39:32|
|Subject: Re: BUG #5776: Unable to create view with parameter in PL/pgsql|
|Previous:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2010-12-11 21:58:47|
|Subject: Re: not all pg_stat_database fields reset after pg_stat_reset()|