Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bytea binary compatible

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bytea binary compatible
Date: 2001-06-24 00:39:22
Message-ID: 9258.993343162@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Here is a patch to make bytea binary compatible with other text data
> types.  Comments?

No way!  Unless you propose to make the text types null-safe (which
would mean such nontrivial projects as replacing strcoll()).

The fact that the storage formats are both struct varlena does not
mean that these types are interchangeable.  I fail to see where it'd
be a good idea to mark them binary-compatible, even if there weren't
serious implementation issues.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-06-24 02:43:02
Subject: Re: Bytea binary compatible
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-06-23 22:21:13
Subject: Re: use GUC for cmdline

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group