Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Is this a change that would be backpatched as you suggested previously?

I don't think we can backpatch any of these items, since they involve
changes in the on-disk file format.  I was thinking of them as CVS HEAD
changes only.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• Re: Quick-and-dirty compression for WAL backup blocks at 2005-05-31 23:32:47 from Simon Riggs

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Satoshi Nagayasu	Date: 2005-06-01 02:29:14
	Subject: Re: audit facilities?
Previous:	From: Christopher Kings-Lynne	Date: 2005-06-01 02:15:44
	Subject: Re: Deadlock with tsearch2 index ...