Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Quick-and-dirty compression for WAL backup blocks

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Quick-and-dirty compression for WAL backup blocks
Date: 2005-06-01 02:20:32
Message-ID: 9156.1117592432@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Is this a change that would be backpatched as you suggested previously?

I don't think we can backpatch any of these items, since they involve
changes in the on-disk file format.  I was thinking of them as CVS HEAD
changes only.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Satoshi NagayasuDate: 2005-06-01 02:29:14
Subject: Re: audit facilities?
Previous:From: Christopher Kings-LynneDate: 2005-06-01 02:15:44
Subject: Re: Deadlock with tsearch2 index ...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group