Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Perc 3 DC

From: Glyn Astill <glynastill(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Steve Clark <sclark(at)netwolves(dot)com>
Cc: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Perc 3 DC
Date: 2008-11-24 14:49:17
Message-ID: 911105.66836.qm@web23605.mail.ird.yahoo.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
--- On Mon, 24/11/08, Steve Clark <sclark(at)netwolves(dot)com> wrote:

> > Yeah the battery's on it, that and the 128Mb is
> really the only reason I thought I'd give it a whirl.
> > 
> > 
> Is the battery  functioning? We found that the unit had to
> be on and charged before write back caching
> would work.

Yeah the battery is on there, and in the BIOS it says it's "PRESENT" and the status is "GOOD".




      

In response to

Responses

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Scott MarloweDate: 2008-11-24 14:52:32
Subject: Re: Perc 3 DC
Previous:From: tvDate: 2008-11-24 13:39:24
Subject: Re: Hash join on int takes 8..114 seconds

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group