Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Volkan YAZICI <volkan(dot)yazici(at)gmail(dot)com>,pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented?
Date: 2005-10-16 17:52:29
Message-ID: 9101.1129485149@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Really?  Do we intend applications to call it?

> Uh, well, we never call it ourselves, so if we don't expect other
> applications to call it, why is it there?

If it's intended for apps to call, how was the patch initially accepted
with no documentation?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-10-16 18:21:31
Subject: Re: Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-10-16 17:15:45
Subject: Re: Will PQregisterThreadLock() be documented?

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Euler Taveira de OliveiraDate: 2005-10-16 17:57:58
Subject: small typo
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-10-16 17:38:53
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patching dblink.c to avoid warning about open transaction

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group