Re: contrib loose ends: 9.0 to 9.1 incompatibilities

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> OK, I held my nose and inserted UPDATE commands to make the opclasses
>> match. AFAICT the only remaining discrepancy between contrib modules
>> made fresh in 9.1 and those updated from 9.0 is the question of citext's
>> collation property, which as noted in the other thread is not worth
>> dealing with until the collation stuff is a bit better thought out.

> OK. Thanks for nailing all of this down - that's got to have been a
> heck of a job.

Yeah, it was a bit of a pain, and took longer than I would've hoped.
It was worth doing though --- I think it not unlikely that in the
long run, the extensions feature will be seen as the largest single
improvement in 9.1.

regards, tom lane