| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |
| Date: | 2006-07-31 19:10:20 |
| Message-ID: | 9049.1154373020@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> The good news is that from a memory and perfomance standpoint, my simple
> test now shows us outperforming mysql:
Sweet ;-)
I'm up to my *ss in fixing relation locking, but will get back to your
thing as soon as that's done. I think you're close enough to qualify
as having made the feature freeze deadline, in any case.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-07-31 20:19:43 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2006-07-31 18:57:35 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-31 20:13:20 | Re: Going for "all green" buildfarm results |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2006-07-31 18:57:35 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-07-31 20:19:43 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2006-07-31 18:57:35 | Re: [HACKERS] 8.2 features? |