Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: arrays as pl/perl input arguments [PATCH]

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: arrays as pl/perl input arguments [PATCH]
Date: 2011-01-13 04:57:20
Message-ID: 9044.1294894640@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
> On Jan 11, 2011, at 3:44 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> I think there's at least a danger of breaking legacy code doing that. Say you have some code that does a ref test on the argument, for example. The behavior would now be changed.

> I think that'd be pretty rare.

I'm not seeing how an unsupported fear that there *might* be some
incompatibilities is a good argument for instead adopting an approach
that absolutely, positively, guaranteed *WILL* break everybody's code.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2011-01-13 05:10:26
Subject: Re: pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting
Previous:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2011-01-13 04:52:20
Subject: Re: pg_primary_conninfo

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group