Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Patch to include PAM support...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Dominic J(dot) Eidson" <sauron(at)the-infinite(dot)org>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Patch to include PAM support...
Date: 2001-06-12 16:32:12
Message-ID: 9043.992363532@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Is there any interest in PAM support?  If not, I will reject this patch.

We have seen multiple requests for PAM support, so there's interest out
there.  But IIRC, I had some serious concerns about this proposed
implementation.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Vince RobertsDate: 2001-06-12 16:33:51
Subject: lo_copy routine
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-06-12 16:28:44
Subject: Improving pg_hba.conf

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-06-12 16:35:10
Subject: Re: Patch to include PAM support...
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-06-12 16:27:44
Subject: Re: Patch to include PAM support...

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group