Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Just as an FYI We are up solid now on pgsql libpq version

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-odbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Just as an FYI We are up solid now on pgsql libpq version
Date: 2005-10-05 17:55:14
Message-ID: 900.1128534914@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-odbc
"Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Joel Fradkin
>> 	We have been up solid. I built the version we are using just
>> prior to your separating aschii and non aschii (so it's the non aschii
>> version).

> Excellent news - hopefully you boss is somewhat happier now as well :-)

> It might be worth trying the very latest CVS code with your DTS packages
> - there's at least one fix in there specifically for a SQL Server
> problem, plus the ANSI build of the driver is much more akin to the 7,4
> series.

Seems like it's about time to consider sticking the new version into
Fedora.  I can't use a CVS pull for that, though; I have to have a
traceable tarball.  Are you planning to make a release soon?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-odbc by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2005-10-05 18:53:16
Subject: Re: Just as an FYI We are up solid now on pgsql libpq version
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-10-05 17:50:03
Subject: Insecurity of ODBC debug logging files

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group